Dazed and Confused
Posted by Joseph Wilson in Theology
So I'm sitting here on my lunch breack at CLM catching up on my blogs. Over the last few days I keep finding out about some of my favorite preachers have such single-sided views of scriptures and it really breaks my heart. I get that not everyone can preach a 12 year series on the book of Romans (not a jab at you Tony, I'm thinking of J Piper,) and thats totally cool. But to say that not all Scripture is applicable to where I'm at now is just stupid. People who play Bible rullete tend to hold to this view. In fact I would argue that expository preaching, and sequential Bible study enables us to apply the Bible in our particular context better than any other preaching or studying practice. I would also argue that this is the way Jesus and the apostles taught as well,( Road to Emmauss anyone?) Its also interesting to me that those who preach this way are also the most culturally engaging preachers as well, (Matt Chandler, Mark Driscoll, Tim Keller, heck even Rob Bell did an exposition of Philipians last year!) Anyways, just my two cents, what are your thoughts?